> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.avra.ai/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Knowledge Graph

> The temporal graph that underlies the Graph Foundation Model — 1B+ entities, the relationships between them, and how both evolve over time.

The Large Knowledge Graph (LKG) is the substrate the Graph Foundation Model is pre-trained on. It captures companies, individuals, assets, and the events that connect them — as a temporal graph, not a snapshot.

Most data products treat relationships as enrichment: a column appended to a row. The LKG treats relationships as structure. Ownership chains, supply paths, judicial and regulatory events, and geographic context are modeled as edges in a graph, not flattened into features.

## What goes into the graph

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Corporate and legal records" icon="building">
    Public registries, corporate filings, ownership structures, and judicial records form the authoritative skeleton of how entities are formally connected.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Behavioral and alternative data" icon="chart-line">
    Licensed datasets capturing economic activity, transaction patterns, and operational signals — the parts of how entities behave that official records do not see.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Geographic and macroeconomic context" icon="map">
    Regional dynamics, infrastructure, and sector conditions situate every entity in the economy it actually operates in.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Your business context" icon="circle-nodes">
    Customer-provided signals enter through your Relational Foundation Model — separate from the LKG, composed at inference time.
  </Card>
</CardGroup>

## Relationships as first-class structure

The graph encodes the relationships that actually drive outcomes:

* **Ownership and control** — direct and indirect participation, holding structures, beneficial ownership
* **Counterparty and supply** — observed business relationships, transaction proximity, dependency chains
* **Judicial and regulatory** — proceedings, sanctions, and compliance events that cascade through networks
* **Geographic and infrastructure** — regional clustering, shared facilities, supply-route proximity
* **Domain-specific** — franchise networks, branch hierarchies, group structures, industry associations

Each relationship type carries its own semantics in the graph. The GFM learns from all of them simultaneously.

## Temporal by design

A graph that only describes today cannot predict tomorrow.

* Every node and edge is versioned. We track when a relationship appears, changes, and disappears.
* Historical states are preserved. The GFM reasons about velocity and momentum, not just current state.
* Decision dates are explicit. Predictions for a past date see only the graph as it existed then — no future leakage, by construction.

## Why it matters

The LKG is not a deliverable on its own. It is the structured substrate that lets the GFM, your RFM, and every downstream model reason about relationships at scale.

* **Cold-start coverage** — new entities are positioned relative to their neighbors, not blanked out
* **Multi-hop reasoning** — risk and opportunity propagate through the graph, not just through direct connections
* **Stable temporal grounding** — backtests, replays, and shadow evaluations operate on the graph as it existed at decision time
