The Territory Problem
Field sales is expensive. A rep can visit maybe 5-8 accounts per day. Choosing the wrong accounts wastes days of selling time. Traditional territory planning uses static lists: “Visit all accounts over R$1M revenue in the South region.” But revenue doesn’t predict who’s ready to buy.Intelligence-Driven Territories
Instead of geography + firmographics, plan territories around:Daily Visit Optimization
Territory: South Region | Rep: Maria Santos | Date: Monday
Rep works the list top-down. Highest-value opportunities get attention first.
Route Optimization + Scoring
Combine visit prioritization with route efficiency:- Score all accounts in territory
- Filter to top 20 by score
- Optimize route through top 20 by geography
- Result: Best accounts, efficient path
Tracking Impact
Measure before/after:- Meetings per closed deal
- Average deal size from field vs. inside
- Time from first visit to close
- Territory revenue per rep
Powered by two foundations
Field sales ranking composes both Avra foundations. The Graph Foundation Model identifies buying propensity through network-level patterns — expansion signals, competitive dynamics, and relationship density that firmographic filters miss. Your Relational Foundation Model learns what “ready to buy” looks like for your product and market, drawn from the patterns in your sales outcomes. The downstream model is trained on both, and feeds signal back into your RFM with every retrain.Customer Data Needed
Output Schema
Evaluation Metrics
- Meetings-to-close ratio — Primary metric: improvement in conversion rate from scored visits vs. unsorted visits.
- Lift at top decile — How much better the model’s top-ranked accounts perform vs. random or firmographic ordering.
- Revenue per rep — Measures territory-level impact of score-based prioritization.